2010年2月27日星期六

電影分享之二: KJ音樂人生


電影「KJ音樂人生」是一套記錄片,記錄了一名香港天才音樂小子由11歲至17歲的音樂成長路,當中夾雜著他與父親、兄長、妹妹、朋友及恩師之間千絲萬縷的關係,展示出一名天才少年尋找人生意義的過程。

既然是一套記錄片,所以拍攝手法十分寫實。電影散場的時候,我聽到很多觀眾的反應是:「嘩, 那小伙子好串喎!」不錯,正如大部份天材一樣,主角黃家正(JK)是一個自負、高傲、狂奔的人,看起來真的很「串」。而我,有以下一些零碎的想法:

  • 天才兒童:中國人大部份都有望子成龍的想法。怎樣才是"成龍"呢? 天才? 資優? "叻"是否真的是最好呢? 如果我有孩子, 我會希望他們平凡一點, 千萬不要是最好的那一群。歷史告訴我, 天才一向都是孤獨的, 他們不能融入人群當中; 人應該是群體生活的動物, 如果一個人命中注定要孤獨一生, 那是多麼的可憐。
  • 比賽的意義: KJ在11歲於香港校際音樂節勝出, 因而開展了他的"音樂天才"之路。他的學校DBS每年於校際音樂節勝出無數比賽, 每當其他同學都沈醉於勝利的氣氛之中, 他鄙視。他認為大家應該focus在音樂之中, 比賽是不重要的。「不要為其他人而演奏, 而是為了自己而演奏」這是KJ說的, 說得很好啊。Life would be much easier for everyone of us if we live for ourselves and for those that we love instead of living under some other people's expectation.
  • 人生的意義:什麼是人生的意義? 什麼是完美? 11歲的KJ已經開始問這些問題, 小小的年幾就想這些問題, 真是苦了他, 也苦了他的家人。我不是天才, 但我被視為一個完美主義者。我估計, 這種性格為我的工作、人生添上不少麻煩。我正在嘗試在不完美的東西之中找尋美麗的東西, 對人, 對自己都寛容一點。說起來容易, 做起來, 我想這會是我人生中的一個長期目標。
 共勉之。

2010年2月24日星期三

當「通識」成為一個科目

當社會上大部份人士都支持把「通識教育」加入新高中課程時(教學上的技術性問題是另外一個議題,在此暫不作討論),筆者一直甚有保留。

筆者相信,政府當初提出「通識教育」是針對社會人士對學生普遍缺乏常識,以及缺乏分析、批判能力的批評而對症下藥。大家又繼而以為「通識教育」是一個跨學科,即讀一科猶如讀了幾科一般,覺得成本效益高,因此支持之聲此起彼落。

雖然「通識教育」已成為新高中學制中一個重要的科目,但筆者仍然希望在此提出一些討論。

筆者認為,常識從來都不是在課堂上學習得來,而是從日常生活中慢慢啟發出來。例如小時候陪媽媽到市場買菜會學懂不同食材的名稱以及食物未煮之前的形態;現在很多人「五穀不分」相信是由於他們從未入廚或到訪傳統街市之故。事實上,自小身邊都有一些朋友/同學彷彿「樣樣通」似的,可謂常識豐富。回想起來,他們都有一些共通點:好奇心重、觀察能力強、博覽叢書等等,這些都不是修讀通識科而學會的。

至於分析和批判能力又可否透過修讀通識科而學會呢?筆者想反過來問:在未有通識科之前,前人就沒有足夠的分析和批判能力嗎?我是上一代人(七十後),記憶中的高中課程(中四至中七)無論是那一個學科都需要很高的分析能力,包括在中文科撰寫議論文、上歷史科了解不同帝國的興起與衰落等等。

我同意透過跨學科的方式來啟發學生從不同層面對不同事物作出分析和思考,但我覺得學習知識的先後次序同樣重要。我認為學生應該先分別學習不同學科,從而以比較簡單的層面去了解一個學科的內容,繼而再鼓勵他們把不同的知識融會貫通。再者,「把不同知識融會貫通」應該是一種理解能力,需要學生充分明白不同的學問才可把不同的學問融會貫通,這就是先後有序。

現在的通識科只不過是一群課程編輯者在背後把各傳統科目重新編排,以另外一個科目名稱「推出市場」。如果學生的學習態度、形式和動機不變,家長和老師對學生的期望亦是不變,「通識」對他們來說就只是另外一個要應付考試的科目。他們依然會期望每一份試題都有一個標準答案,從他們的角度看來,也是人之常情。

「通識教育」的理念是可取的,但當「通識」成為一個科目,那就只是換湯不換藥。

2010年2月22日星期一

名校

家長希望子女入讀名校已不是新鮮事, 除了各大小媒體時不時的報導之外, 身邊亦不乏朋友、同事為子女各出奇謀, 就是為了報讀心儀名校。如此種種, 我看在眼裏, 想起很多東西......

我是名校出身的, 小學及初中入讀灣仔半山一天主教女校, 之後轉往另一間在中西區的男女校至中七畢業。作為一個名校舊生, 我不想數名校的不是 (因為旁人聽起來會覺得我扮清高, 尤其是因為我仍然決定不生孩子, It's just too convenient to pretend that you don't care because you don't need to care), 但我想討論一下名校是否真的利多於弊, 如果有家長看到這篇文章, 我希望他們會因此而停一停, 諗一諗。

一眾家長們, 我估計, 你們都覺得名校好, 名校有品質保證, 名校學生不會學壞, 總之名校總比其他的好。但是你們有沒有想過, 名校是否適合你的子女? 你們有沒有真正了解名校究竟是怎樣的, 再了解你們的子女是怎樣的, 然後做一個match analysis, 看看他們是否good match, 再送他們進去? 又或者, 你們有沒有真正想過希望子女在一個怎樣的環境下長大呢?

以下是我對名校的一些看法, 雖然看起來有點stereotype, 但我相信這些"名校特徵"多多少少是存在的:

  1. 學生的家庭背景: 在我讀書的年代, 大部份學生都來自中產家庭, 亦有一小部份同學來自很富裕的家庭, 當中包括社會上顯赫的家族, 而像我這些出身草根的藍領家庭, 比例比較少。現在很多名校都改為直資學校, 我相信出身草根的學生的比例會更少。
  2. 學生的資質: 無可否認, 名校大部份學生都是聰明仔聰明女(尤其是讀書方面), 當中真的不乏天材學生。與一班聰明仔聰明女一起學習, 基本上會有兩個結果: 一是遇強愈強, 一是越讀越吃力。
  3. 學校對學生家庭的期望: 由於大部份家長都是中產人士, 他們的學歷不會太低, 可以給子女的資源亦不會太少。這個情況學校是知道的, 結果是學校會在某程度上依賴家長在家"教"他們的子女, 不是家教/身教的"教", 而是如果學生的數學成績略欠理想, 家長便會請補習老師來替子女惡補, 而學校在某程度上是expect家長會這樣做的。 
  4. 學校對學生的期望: 學校會expect學生一定成為社會上的棟樑----意思是上大學, 畢業後最好成為一個professional, 如律師, 醫生, 等等。
各位家長, 看到這裏, 你們可能會問, 這些名校特點都很好呀, 有什麼問題? ......等一等, 這些名校特點的確沒有問題, 這些是一些hard facts, 而根據這些hard facts, 你們要問的問題是, 你們的子女是否適合入讀名校? 你們是否想你的子女在這種環境下長大?

這個match analysis不是容易做的, 不是因為你們的analytical skill不足, 而是因為你們要分析自己, 以及自己的子女。雖然我不是家長, 但我相信要家長們十分客觀地去了解自己, 子女以及家庭狀況是十分困難的。要知道, 對現實作出客觀的分析是一件事, 對現實作出的期望又是另一件事, 家長會不經不覺的把期望變成現實。說得簡單一點: 世界上差不多每個家長都希望自己的子女聰明絕頂, 年年考第一, 但第一只有一個, 既然有人考第一, 亦會有人包尾。說得再mean一點, 如果你的子女自小就不是聰明的一群, 你們可否大大方方地承認?

分析完自己以及子女之後, 接下來的, 是分析一下大家跟名校是否合得來 (character match), 或入讀名校會否更容易達成你的目標(當然, 在此之前, 你亦要定下目標, 例如, 你想子女在一個怎樣的環境長大; 目標人人不同, 亦沒有標準)。

為了幫助大家了解自己的目標, 以及做match analysis, 我想根據我上述提出的"名校特徵"分享一些個人感受/經歷:

我出身草根階層, 雖不是窮得要攞綜緩, 但比較之下, 同學身上的名牌、出國旅遊的次數、零用錢等等都比自己多。回想起, 由於跟著一班中產/有錢同學玩, 玩意也是比較"高檔"的(但那時候是不察覺的)。直至上了大學, 身邊的朋友/同學大部份來自草根, 我才知道以前的玩意是如何"高檔"──對草根同學來說, 卡拉OK不是個個月去, 而是大時大節儲到錢才去, 而且不是去CEO Neway, 而是去一些名字都記不起的小店, 平很多的; 生日才去Pizza Hut, 而不是個個星期六choir rehearsal之後都去; 遊艇出海? 草根同學讀中學時想也沒想過, 上大學後做Part time有少少錢可以一班朋友包船出海釣墨魚, 而我呢, 去過最豪華的中學生生日派對就是坐壽星女父親的遊艇出海, 再去西貢食海鮮。上大學之後, 我亦知道有同學的童年活動是放學後回家在茶餐廳後行洗碗, 又或是幫手送外賣。

我一直以來都是勤奮的學生, 因為知道自己天資有限, 需要將勤補缺, 但雖如此, 我的成績都只屬中等。面對一班"天材同學", 他們終日玩樂, 上堂人在心不在, 考試前好像不用溫習的樣子(他們究竟有沒有溫習, 到現在仍然是一個迷), 我等凡人, 心中真是不是味兒。而一眾老師呢, 不知道是否因為多年來不費吹灰之力仍然能"教"出一班"天材"(事實上, 既是"天材", 他們根本就是無師自撓), 他們大部份都不懂得(或沒有資源)處理一班成績較差的學生。

作為名校, 母校畢業生每年入大學率很高, 接近100%。在我的年代 (10年前), 聽說每年最多只有1名學生未能考入大學。可以保持這個極高的大學入學率, 是因為"讀唔上"的同學們大部份會在中六之前往外國升學(因為他們都有錢啊!)。仍然記得畢業的那一年, 我的一位同班同學因為中國文化科不合格而考不上大學, 入了CITY U讀High Dip, 已沒有聯絡。我只知道, 那年12月, 當大家從大學校園趕回母校行畢業禮的時候, 他沒有被邀請, 學校只給他一封信証明他在學校"修業X年",沒發畢業証書。


我無意批評中產/有錢人,有錢不是罪, 而他們亦有權給予子女任何東西。

我無意批評名校的老師, 他們都是出色的老師, 桃李滿天下,不可能期望他們對每一個學生都付予十足的關懷。他們只是在一個既定的環境下教授知識。

沒發畢業証書其實亦沒有什麼大不了, 只反映了一所學校的辦學取態。

如果你想子女入名校, 但自問生活水平未必可以追得上中產/有錢, 你們的子女有可能會面對一些壓力, 因為朋輩之間互相比較是一定會出現的, 香港社會物質主義愈來愈嚴重, 不要天真地以為這不會影響他們的成長;

如果你一心希望子女可以認識多一些上流社會人士, 好讓他們長大之後可以利用這些關係嫁個有錢人或創一番事業, 那入名校確實是一個可行的第一步;

如果你自問生活中產/有錢, 遊艇出海是天天做的事, 子女當然是在這種環境下長大, OK, 沒有問題;

如果你自問生活中產/有錢,送子女出國讀書是必然的事, 因為想他們有多一點exposure; 那不一定要送子女入名校啊, 讓他們認識多一些草根階層的朋友也是一種exposure, 只要有你給他們的教育機會, 他們長大後是不會沒有出路的;

如果你的子女自小就不是聰明的一群, 不要希望入名校會令他們聰明一點, 成績更好一點, 事實可能會剛剛相反, 這只會更加打擊他們的自信心。

不要以為名校是子女健康成長的唯一可行之路; 同時, 請緊記不會有一間學校是完美的, 千萬不要以為一間學校可以給予子女所有他們所需要的東西。孩子的成長本是一個複雜的互動過程, 學校只是一個讓他們吸收知識, 學習待人接物的其中一個地方。

2010年2月13日星期六

八十後

最近社會討論"八十後"討論得熱騰騰的, "八十後"已經成為社會上一個term, 一個用來label一些人物, 事物, 或社會風氣/現象的一個term, 將一些複雜的社會議題reduce to"八十後"這一個彷彿已變成口頭禪的詞彙.

看著大家討論得熾熱, 我也來趁一趁熱鬧......

看過好一些評論, 也從電視機看過很多報導, 我有以下的一些想法。

一個社會, 特別是一個資訊發達, 開放的社會, 當中總會包含著主流(majority)及非主流(minority)的聲音。作為一個一切以經濟掛帥,以經濟效益為主導的社會, 香港的主流聲音是明顯不過的----經濟行先啊!! 如此看來,  高鐵是一定會建造的, 菜園村亦守不了多久; 不為什麼, 只因為菜園村村民及"八十後"一群都是minority.

主流社會的群體(包括政府的AO們)面對"八十後"有點不知所操, 相信是他們不明白為什麼"八十後"會在毫無利益掛帥的情況下仍然奮不顧身, 義無反顧的抗爭下去; 用主流人士的perspective看來, It doesn't make any sense. 事實上, 這方面的討論已經有很多人提出過, 我也不在此反覆討論, 我只想在此多加一點點以豐富其討論層面。

既然這些"八十後"都是minority, 他們在一段很長的時間內亦會保持minority的status (畢竟一個社會的意識形態不會一時三刻被改變啊, 除非是獨裁社會), 那為什麼主流社會(包括香港政府)要那麼在意這些minority的聲音呢? 一個開放的社會, 開明的政府是應該包容不同聲音呀!香港政府何不表現得大方一點呢? 政府一方面說自己會聽取各方意見, 說自己包容, 另一方面又用胡椒噴霧, 又拘留陳巧文, 從minority的perspective看來, 也是It doesn't make any sense at all.  香港政府, 你怕什麼呢, 我一點也不明白。如果我是香港政府, 表現得大方一點的做法, 可以以熱茶西餅來取代胡椒噴霧呀。

再拉遠一點......

社會上討論公共空間(Public Space or Public Sphere)已有一段日子, 但都好像留於"土地"空間的討論(即時代廣場平台這片地的使用權等等)。其實公共空間(Public Sphere)的理論應該是Habermas在The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere一書中提出的。公共空間的"空間"其實不只是一些"土地性"的空間, 亦包含著其他"非土地性"的空間, 例如電台的大氣電波, 報章, internet的forum, 大學校園內的大字報, 等等, 都是一些空間讓人民得以表達自己的意見。Habermas認為, 每一個社會都會有各式各樣的空間讓人發表意見, 極權社會亦然。不同的政府亦會intentionally製造一些public sphere好讓人民意見得以發表, 人的emotion得以release出來; 只要這些public sphere得以妥善地控制著, 取得一個平衡點, majority的地位不變, minority的聲音得以release出來, 大家互相制衡著, 社會是相安無事的。社會越開放, 公共空間亦會越多。

說回香港, "八十後"等社會現象, 我覺得香港政府好像很怕不同聲音, 亦不懂得處理在公共空間內的討論, 更不懂得讓自己取得一個平衡點。一個強勢政府不是要control everything, 而是要everything under its control, that's it, 而且都是那一句, 大方一些吧!

2010年2月12日星期五

Steve Jobs

大部份人對Steve Jobs的認識應該圍繞著Apple, iPhone, iPod, etc etc. 而我呢, 對他印象最深的, 應該是他2005年在Stanford的Commencement Address. 我曾經把這篇speech print了出來, 貼在office自己的座位內, 每次工作不如意的時候, 總會看完再看。

最近工作不如意, 遲職兩個多月了。昨天約了一位曾一同出生入死的舊同事/好朋友出來聚會, 席間提及大家的career development, 又是百感交集。可能因此又想起了Steve Jobs......



You've got to find what you love,' Jobs says

This is the text of the Commencement address by Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer and of Pixar Animation Studios, delivered on June 12, 2005.

I am honored to be with you today at your commencement from one of the finest universities in the world. I never graduated from college. Truth be told, this is the closest I've ever gotten to a college graduation. Today I want to tell you three stories from my life. That's it. No big deal. Just three stories.

The first story is about connecting the dots.

I dropped out of Reed College after the first 6 months, but then stayed around as a drop-in for another 18 months or so before I really quit. So why did I drop out?

It started before I was born. My biological mother was a young, unwed college graduate student, and she decided to put me up for adoption. She felt very strongly that I should be adopted by college graduates, so everything was all set for me to be adopted at birth by a lawyer and his wife. Except that when I popped out they decided at the last minute that they really wanted a girl. So my parents, who were on a waiting list, got a call in the middle of the night asking: "We have an unexpected baby boy; do you want him?" They said: "Of course." My biological mother later found out that my mother had never graduated from college and that my father had never graduated from high school. She refused to sign the final adoption papers. She only relented a few months later when my parents promised that I would someday go to college.

And 17 years later I did go to college. But I naively chose a college that was almost as expensive as Stanford, and all of my working-class parents' savings were being spent on my college tuition. After six months, I couldn't see the value in it. I had no idea what I wanted to do with my life and no idea how college was going to help me figure it out. And here I was spending all of the money my parents had saved their entire life. So I decided to drop out and trust that it would all work out OK. It was pretty scary at the time, but looking back it was one of the best decisions I ever made. The minute I dropped out I could stop taking the required classes that didn't interest me, and begin dropping in on the ones that looked interesting.

It wasn't all romantic. I didn't have a dorm room, so I slept on the floor in friends' rooms, I returned coke bottles for the 5¢ deposits to buy food with, and I would walk the 7 miles across town every Sunday night to get one good meal a week at the Hare Krishna temple. I loved it. And much of what I stumbled into by following my curiosity and intuition turned out to be priceless later on. Let me give you one example:

Reed College at that time offered perhaps the best calligraphy instruction in the country. Throughout the campus every poster, every label on every drawer, was beautifully hand calligraphed. Because I had dropped out and didn't have to take the normal classes, I decided to take a calligraphy class to learn how to do this. I learned about serif and san serif typefaces, about varying the amount of space between different letter combinations, about what makes great typography great. It was beautiful, historical, artistically subtle in a way that science can't capture, and I found it fascinating.

None of this had even a hope of any practical application in my life. But ten years later, when we were designing the first Macintosh computer, it all came back to me. And we designed it all into the Mac. It was the first computer with beautiful typography. If I had never dropped in on that single course in college, the Mac would have never had multiple typefaces or proportionally spaced fonts. And since Windows just copied the Mac, its likely that no personal computer would have them. If I had never dropped out, I would have never dropped in on this calligraphy class, and personal computers might not have the wonderful typography that they do. Of course it was impossible to connect the dots looking forward when I was in college. But it was very, very clear looking backwards ten years later.

Again, you can't connect the dots looking forward; you can only connect them looking backwards. So you have to trust that the dots will somehow connect in your future. You have to trust in something — your gut, destiny, life, karma, whatever. This approach has never let me down, and it has made all the difference in my life.

My second story is about love and loss.

I was lucky — I found what I loved to do early in life. Woz and I started Apple in my parents garage when I was 20. We worked hard, and in 10 years Apple had grown from just the two of us in a garage into a $2 billion company with over 4000 employees. We had just released our finest creation — the Macintosh — a year earlier, and I had just turned 30. And then I got fired. How can you get fired from a company you started? Well, as Apple grew we hired someone who I thought was very talented to run the company with me, and for the first year or so things went well. But then our visions of the future began to diverge and eventually we had a falling out. When we did, our Board of Directors sided with him. So at 30 I was out. And very publicly out. What had been the focus of my entire adult life was gone, and it was devastating.

I really didn't know what to do for a few months. I felt that I had let the previous generation of entrepreneurs down - that I had dropped the baton as it was being passed to me. I met with David Packard and Bob Noyce and tried to apologize for screwing up so badly. I was a very public failure, and I even thought about running away from the valley. But something slowly began to dawn on me — I still loved what I did. The turn of events at Apple had not changed that one bit. I had been rejected, but I was still in love. And so I decided to start over.

I didn't see it then, but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again, less sure about everything. It freed me to enter one of the most creative periods of my life.

During the next five years, I started a company named NeXT, another company named Pixar, and fell in love with an amazing woman who would become my wife. Pixar went on to create the worlds first computer animated feature film, Toy Story, and is now the most successful animation studio in the world. In a remarkable turn of events, Apple bought NeXT, I returned to Apple, and the technology we developed at NeXT is at the heart of Apple's current renaissance. And Laurene and I have a wonderful family together.

I'm pretty sure none of this would have happened if I hadn't been fired from Apple. It was awful tasting medicine, but I guess the patient needed it. Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don't lose faith. I'm convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You've got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven't found it yet, keep looking. Don't settle. As with all matters of the heart, you'll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking until you find it. Don't settle.

My third story is about death.

When I was 17, I read a quote that went something like: "If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you'll most certainly be right." It made an impression on me, and since then, for the past 33 years, I have looked in the mirror every morning and asked myself: "If today were the last day of my life, would I want to do what I am about to do today?" And whenever the answer has been "No" for too many days in a row, I know I need to change something.

Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure - these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.

About a year ago I was diagnosed with cancer. I had a scan at 7:30 in the morning, and it clearly showed a tumor on my pancreas. I didn't even know what a pancreas was. The doctors told me this was almost certainly a type of cancer that is incurable, and that I should expect to live no longer than three to six months. My doctor advised me to go home and get my affairs in order, which is doctor's code for prepare to die. It means to try to tell your kids everything you thought you'd have the next 10 years to tell them in just a few months. It means to make sure everything is buttoned up so that it will be as easy as possible for your family. It means to say your goodbyes.

I lived with that diagnosis all day. Later that evening I had a biopsy, where they stuck an endoscope down my throat, through my stomach and into my intestines, put a needle into my pancreas and got a few cells from the tumor. I was sedated, but my wife, who was there, told me that when they viewed the cells under a microscope the doctors started crying because it turned out to be a very rare form of pancreatic cancer that is curable with surgery. I had the surgery and I'm fine now.

This was the closest I've been to facing death, and I hope its the closest I get for a few more decades. Having lived through it, I can now say this to you with a bit more certainty than when death was a useful but purely intellectual concept:

No one wants to die. Even people who want to go to heaven don't want to die to get there. And yet death is the destination we all share. No one has ever escaped it. And that is as it should be, because Death is very likely the single best invention of Life. It is Life's change agent. It clears out the old to make way for the new. Right now the new is you, but someday not too long from now, you will gradually become the old and be cleared away. Sorry to be so dramatic, but it is quite true.

Your time is limited, so don't waste it living someone else's life. Don't be trapped by dogma — which is living with the results of other people's thinking. Don't let the noise of others' opinions drown out your own inner voice. And most important, have the courage to follow your heart and intuition. They somehow already know what you truly want to become. Everything else is secondary.

When I was young, there was an amazing publication called The Whole Earth Catalog, which was one of the bibles of my generation. It was created by a fellow named Stewart Brand not far from here in Menlo Park, and he brought it to life with his poetic touch. This was in the late 1960's, before personal computers and desktop publishing, so it was all made with typewriters, scissors, and polaroid cameras. It was sort of like Google in paperback form, 35 years before Google came along: it was idealistic, and overflowing with neat tools and great notions.

Stewart and his team put out several issues of The Whole Earth Catalog, and then when it had run its course, they put out a final issue. It was the mid-1970s, and I was your age. On the back cover of their final issue was a photograph of an early morning country road, the kind you might find yourself hitchhiking on if you were so adventurous. Beneath it were the words: "Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish." It was their farewell message as they signed off. Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish. And I have always wished that for myself. And now, as you graduate to begin anew, I wish that for you.

Stay Hungry. Stay Foolish.

Thank you all very much.



2010年2月11日星期四

給我身邊的女性朋友

給我身邊的女性朋友....當中包括那些已經離婚, 正在攪離婚, 正在一段關係之中掙扎, 以及仍然是單身的她們。

香港是一個思想保守的國際大都會, 很多人對上述人士都會多多少少作出批評。

我, 32歲, 已婚5年, 婚姻美滿。我一直認為, 我是幸運的一群。我在大學認識我的丈夫, 拍拖7年結婚。我慶幸自己找到一個可以一起生活, 相處, 一起分享的伴侶, 我是幸運的。

雖然我結了婚, 但我不相信婚姻制度。我只相信, 在芒芒人海中找到一個可以一起過下半世的另外一半是有福的。結婚與否, 並不重要。我相信, 大部份人需要的不是婚姻, 而是一個伴侶。

朋友們, 請你們不要因為之前的一些失敗而放棄, 你們仍然年青, 美麗, 成熟, 有智慧; 你們有能力, 亦能夠一個人生活, 但我仍然相信, 找一個會分享你的生活, 能與你一起生活的伴侶是更有福的。

幸福是要努力尋找的, 加油啊!

那些已經離婚以及正在攪離婚的朋友們, 祝你們越嫁越好!

2010年2月4日星期四

十年

人生有幾多個十年?

2009年, 是我大學畢業十年.....轉眼十年了, 這十年間, 我做了什麼?

1999 - 2001是兩年艱苦的M.Phil歲月, 一個人在廣州出field做research, 一個人寫論文, 多少個晚上一個人在學系的辦公室或宿舍寫文, 改卷, 備課, 看一大堆有關自己research的書......也是在讀M.Phil的時候, 我開始失眠

2001年9月11日, 就是"9.11事件"的那一年, 我 M.Phil畢業, 我用了大半年搵工

2002年2月至今, 出來社會工作。如果我在這8年間無間斷的工作, 至今, 我應該疊積了8年的工作經驗。可惜, 工作並不順利。這8年間, 我曾先後在8間機構工作, 包括大學, 政府, 細公司, 大企業, 上市公司, regional office, etc etc. 工作最長的有2年, 最短的只有1個月, 有自己遲職, 也有被"炒", 游手好閒的時間加起來也有1-2年。我知道一定有人在我背後說三道四, 說我不夠刻苦, 說我因為結了婚有人養(事實唔係), 說我因為"屋企唔等錢洗"。我曾經十分在意別人的說話, 自信心一直都很低, 我不忿, 因為自問十分努力, 但上天沒有眷顧我。我不貪錢, 但也不甘心自己的人工跟一個fresh grad差不多呀, 畢竟我的工作能力比他們高呀!

2002年至今, 除了不如意的工作, 我還在:
- 2004年11月, 我結婚了, 至今婚姻生活平淡, 但是舒服的
- 2005-2006中間, Part time讀了HKU SPACE的Diploma in Marketing
- 2007-2008中間, 又Part time讀了CU Continuing Studies的Advanced Professional Diploma in PR and Communications

2009年年底, 想不到, 我又走到一個萬分無奈的交叉口, 在一個我的身體已經無法支撐, 精神差不多分裂的情況下, 我遲職了。

十年, 就此過去了, 下一個十年, 又會是怎樣呢?

2010年2月3日星期三

Peter Drucker


認識Peter Drucker是幾年前當我在 HKU SPACE 讀 Diploma in Marketing 的時候。那時教Market Research這個module的那位阿Sir, 向我們介紹了兩位很出名的作家/學者, 一是Father of Marketing, Philip Kolter, 另一位是Father of Management, Peter Drucker.

仍記得阿SIR打趣的說:「完成這個COURSE之後, 你們不用記得我, 但請你們記得Kolter和Drucker,有機會的話, 看看他們的書, 一生受用。」幾年後, 我在美國買了兩本Drucker, 其中一本是以下這一本, 看後的感覺是----沒想到自己會看得如此津津有味!


The Essential Drucker
by Peter Drucker
Collins Business Essentials 2001

我不是讀Business School出身的。可能曾經有一點看不起其他專業的思想吧(罪過, 罪過), 我一直以為Business Related的書會很悶, 而且會有點空洞, 但看了這本Peter Drucker後, 我會極力推介給任何人, 因為除了講Management, 也講做人。在此節錄一些我覺得很受用的章節, 共勉之。

Under Marketing Objectives: (我是做MARKETING的, 這一節, 體會很深)
"Obviously, not everybody can be the leader. One has to decide in which segment of the market, with what product, what services, what values, one should be the leader. It does not do much good for a company's sales to go up if it loses market share, that is, if the market expands much faster than the company's sales do."
"Market standing, regardless of the sales curve, is therefore essential."
"There is also a maximum market standing above which it may be unwise to go -- even if there were no antitrust laws. Market domination tends to pull the leader to sleep..."
(P33)

我不是一個Management(一般人的看法), 因為我一直只是一個曾經在不同機構任職的小職員。在不同的機構, 遇過不同的Management, 再看這本書, 萬般滋味在心頭:

"Long before the time has come at which management by one person no longer works and becomes mismanagement, that one person also has to start learning how to work with colleagues, has to learn to trust people, yet also how to hold them accountable. The founder has to learn to become the leader of a team rather than a "star" with "helpers"." (pp155-156)

"The man who focuses on efforts and who stresses his downward authority is a subordinate no matter how exalted his title and rank. But the man who focuses on contribution and who takes responsibility for results, no matter how junior, is in the most literal sense of the phrase, "top management". He holds himself accountable for the performance of the whole." (p208)

"The foundation of effective leadership is thinking through the organization's mission, defining it, and establishing it, clearly and visibly. The leader sets the goals, sets the priorities, and sets and maintains the standards. He makes compromises, of course; indeed, effective leaders are painfully aware that they are not in control of the universe." (p270)
".....the leader see leadership as responsibility rather than as rank and privilege." (p270)
"...an effective leader wants strong associates; he encourages them, pushes them, indeed glories in them. Because he holds himself ultimately responsible for the mistakes of his associates and subordinates, he also sees the triumphs of his associates and subordinates as his triumphs, rather than as threats." (p270)
"The final requirement of effective leadership is to earn trust." (p271)

This strikes me very hard indeed....我知道, 我要找一個可以令我沈迷的興趣, 或去做義工, 或去找一個SECOND CAREER...

"In a knowledge society we expect everyone to be a "success". But this is clearly an impossibility. For a great many people there is, at best, absence of failure. For where there is success, there has to be failure. And then it is vitally important for the individual -- but equally for the individual's family -- that there be an area in which the individual contributes, makes a difference, and is somebody. That means having a second area, whether a second career, a parallel career, a social venture, a serious outside interest, anything offering an opportunity for being a leader, for being respected, for being a success." (pp284-285)

Life . Living . Job

我想, 我要好好的記著LIFE, LIVING 以及JOB的分別。

LIFE: 是我的人生, 包括我的家人, 家庭, 婚姻, 朋友, 工作, 興趣, 旅遊, 等等......

LIVING: 生活, 有時是迫人的; 工作 --> 收入是 Make a Living

JOB: 有工作, 令我可以維持生活, 但不是我的LIFE

我希望, 我未來的工作不會再支配我的生活, 以至我的人生。